{"id":10594,"date":"2025-12-09T12:59:55","date_gmt":"2025-12-09T17:59:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/?p=10594"},"modified":"2025-12-09T13:03:49","modified_gmt":"2025-12-09T18:03:49","slug":"moma-visit-transcends-into-living-art","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/2025\/12\/09\/moma-visit-transcends-into-living-art\/","title":{"rendered":"MoMA Visit Transcends Into Living Art"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>By Sasha Smolansky<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At first glance, the MoMA struck me as an extravagant waste of space\u2014a collection of splatters and errors by artists who, having failed to master traditional techniques or to acquire conventional acclaim, invented new movements like cubism and abstract art to mask their inadequacies. I entered with this rigid, unyielding opinion, my skepticism only deepening as the first-floor galleries blurred into unremarkable sameness. However, I was blind to the profound depth modern art could encompass. Only upon reaching the fifth and sixth floors did my understanding begin to shift. Until then, I had believed that for art to be beautiful, it must conform to my narrow definitions of beauty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"221\" src=\"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/68\/2025\/12\/unnamed-3-6.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-10602\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Mike Kelley&#8217;s <em>Deodorized<\/em> <em>Central Mass with Satellites<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>One of the first exhibits I encountered was Mike Kelley&#8217;s entrancing <em>Deodorized Central Mass with Satellites<\/em>. The piece features stuffed animals clustered in a cellular arrangement with one &#8220;focal mass&#8221; surrounded by 13 &#8220;satellites.&#8221; In 1987, Kelley began creating sculptures from secondhand plush toys purchased at thrift stores and yard sales. He described stuffed animals as &#8220;the adult&#8217;s perfect model of a child:&#8221; cute, clean, and devoid of sexuality. Yet, his toys were discarded and soiled, seemingly beyond redemption; they became darkly humorous monuments to lost innocence and repressed trauma.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>As I continued exploring, I realized the power of art to unite people. Though others understood the pieces no better than I did, they sat together, stared, pondered, and discussed potential significance. The essence of art lies not in immediate understanding but in the curiosity and connections it fosters, thereby alluding that true beauty is rarely obvious. It emerges through shared exploration and interpretation, and as we immerse ourselves in art, we become extensions of the original work, transcending the confines of the frame.\u00a0<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>As these repurposed animals hung overhead, we became immersed in the moving display. I noticed it was adults, in particular, who stood in awe, visibly affected. Where most art portrays idealized human bodies, leaving spectators breathless in adoration of the nude, Kelley&#8217;s work offered something different: a chance to confront and overcome the objectification so prevalent in art history. Only by returning to a state of simplicity, when we were essentially pure, could we appreciate his art and find respite. We momentarily reconnected with a more unburdened part of ourselves, still naive to the world&#8217;s cruelty. Interestingly, all the animals are sewn so their faces remain hidden, forcing us to project our own memories onto these faceless forms, making the return to childhood feel more personal and universal at once. Through his art, Kelley offered a moment of peace, a chance to reclaim our stolen innocence and briefly escape the pains of adult life we were so violently thrust into. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"226\" src=\"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/68\/2025\/12\/unnamed-5.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-10607\" style=\"width:388px;height:auto\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Mike Shelley&#8217;s  <em>Deodorized<\/em> <em>Central Mass with Satellites<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Walking to the next floor, Ren\u00e9 Magritte&#8217;s <em>The Lovers <\/em>(1928) resonated with me just as profoundly. The longer I contemplated it, the more interpretations emerged, its mystery inviting each viewer to discover personal meaning.<br><br>Initially, the painting seemed to explore how desire blinds us, leading us to impose illusions of our longings onto others or embrace distorted visions of those closest to us. However, as I reflected further, a darker warning revealed itself: we cannot truly unveil even our most intimate companions. We are, therefore, constrained to love a lie, a carefully constructed facade rather than authentic truth. Do we then genuinely connect with others, or merely entangle ourselves in their illusions?<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"223\" src=\"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/68\/2025\/12\/unnamed1-4.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-10608\" style=\"width:309px;height:auto\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Ren\u00e9 Magritte&#8217;s <em>The Lovers <\/em>(1928)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>The work captures love&#8217;s central paradox, our desperate yearning for acceptance while grappling with deception. Despite the suffocation and pain of mystery, we persist, finding comfort in momentary passion and strange solace in the fabrication itself. We accept what&#8217;s offered because loneliness within a partnership feels preferable to solitude, even as we remain trapped and struggling to breathe.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Yet the painting may speak to the opposite struggle: our inability to open ourselves. Haunted by past wounds, we struggle to trust ourselves enough to be vulnerable. We persist in concealment, unable to reveal our true essence, perpetuating the very disconnection we fear. Once again, I found myself becoming part of the work, confronting my own capacity for both deception and self-protection, transformed into a living extension of Magritte&#8217;s haunting meditation on intimacy&#8217;s impossibility.<br><br>As I continued through the museum, this sense of personal immersion deepened. Marc Chagall&#8217;s<em> I and the Village<\/em> (1911) spoke to me through striking parallels in our backgrounds. Chagall and I grew up Jewish with connections to the Soviet Union, as both he and my parents fled from the Soviet Union to escape religious persecution. Though he lived in Paris and I in the United States, we were both nurtured in environments rich in Jewish culture and values.<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>Chagall&#8217;s work vividly encapsulates these values through its portrayal of peaceful coexistence. The painting reflects a profound aspect of Jewish tradition: reverence for all life. This mutual dependence between human and animal, signified by lines connecting the peasant&#8217;s and cow&#8217;s eyes, resonates deeply with kosher practice and its emphasis on respect for every living being.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><br>Though I don&#8217;t fully grasp cubism or find it particularly engaging, its connection to an issue deeply rooted in my heart allowed me to appreciate both the style and message. Chagall&#8217;s fragmented approach powerfully communicates the ache of displacement, the sacred bond between all living things rooted in Jewish tradition, and the struggle to preserve these values in a world that forced us to leave our homes, proving that profound concepts can transcend abstract form through the universal language of human emotion. Once again, I found myself drawn into the work, not as an outside observer, but as someone who shared Chagall&#8217;s memories and longing for a world of gentle coexistence.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"227\" height=\"300\" src=\"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/68\/2025\/12\/unnamed2-2.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-10609\" style=\"width:319px;height:auto\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Marc Chagall&#8217;s <em>I and the Village <\/em>(1911)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>I left the museum transformed, a different, perhaps larger person, than when I entered. Though some pieces took longer to reveal themselves and others still hold mysteries I&#8217;ve yet to unravel, I was required to recognize beauty in minute details. This experience awakened a new ability to notice and appreciate the subtleties of the world around me.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I realized that to be truly grateful, we must recognize the significance of everything that encapsulates us because we ourselves are living, breathing art. Art imitates life; we are surrounded by a canvas that we paint with our individual, vivid experiences and realities. Artists simply allow us to revel in the art implicit in our own lives, reminding us that beauty and meaning emerge not from passive observation, but from our willingness to become part of the work itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\"><div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"224\" src=\"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/68\/2025\/12\/unnamed3-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-10610\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Sasha Smolansky At first glance, the MoMA struck me as an extravagant waste of space\u2014a collection of splatters and errors by artists who, having failed to master traditional techniques or to acquire conventional acclaim, invented new movements like cubism and abstract art to mask their inadequacies. I entered with this rigid, unyielding opinion, my&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":703,"featured_media":10574,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"portfolio_post_id":0,"portfolio_citation":"","portfolio_annotation":"","openlab_post_visibility":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[187,1523],"class_list":["post-10594","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-arts-entertainment","tag-art","tag-new-york-city"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10594","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/703"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10594"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10594\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10615,"href":"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10594\/revisions\/10615"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10574"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10594"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10594"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/openlab.macaulay.cuny.edu\/messenger\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10594"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}