Carell Pigeot

When I first read the article about NYC youth using art to tell their stories while involved in the justice system, one phrase immediately came to mind “I Am More Than What You Call Me.” That became the title of my collage because I felt like it summed up everything I wanted to say in just a few words. The cause I’m supporting is giving young people, especially those impacted by the justice system, the opportunity to tell their own stories through art instead of letting society define them by one mistake or one label. Growing up, I was impacted by the justice system myself at a young age, so this wasn’t just another class assignment to me. It was personal. I know how quickly people can make assumptions about someone without ever taking the time to understand who they really are. The first thing I wanted people to notice was the title. I wrote “I AM MORE THAN WHAT YOU CALL ME” in large, letters because, after reading Art of Protest, I realized typography can be just as powerful as the images themselves. The book explains that bold lettering is meant to grab attention, and using large capital letters makes a message feel like it’s being shouted instead of whispered. I wanted my message to be impossible to ignore. I also thought carefully about the colors I used. I chose bright yellow behind the title because, yellow represents hope, positivity, and brighter days ahead. Even though my collage talks about difficult topics, I didn’t want it to end in darkness. I wanted the title to remind people that there is still hope and that a young person’s future doesn’t have to be defined by their past. On the other hand, I used red around the image of the young person in handcuffs and around some of the negative labels because, to me, red represents the way society often views these young people, as dangerous, violent, or a threat before anyone even knows their story. The book describes red as a color connected to passion, danger, power, and revolution, and I thought it fit the emotions surrounding those labels perfectly.

That’s also why I included words like “Criminal,” “Gang Member,” and “Delinquent.” Those are labels people often place on young people, and once those labels stick, they’re difficult to escape. Right next to them, I included words like Son,” “Family,” and “Artist” because those identities are just as real. Someone can make mistakes and still be a loving family member, a creative person, and someone with dreams for their future. The article itself inspired the rest of my collage. What stood out to me most was seeing artwork that was actually created by the youth in the program. Instead of someone else speaking for them, they were telling their own stories through photography, drawings, and design. That’s why I included the photograph of the youth holding a camera and the house and room sketches they created. Those pieces show that these young people are creative, talented, and full of ideas. They aren’t just a statistic or a case number. One thing I learned from Art of Protest is that collage is powerful because it brings together photographs, handwritten words, illustrations, and different images to communicate one message. I wanted my collage to do exactly that. Instead of using only pictures or only words, I combined everything so the viewer could see both the labels society gives young people and the identities they choose for themselves.

The quote at the bottom, “My past is part of my story. It is not the end of it,” is probably my favorite part because it ties everything together. That’s the message I want people to leave with. Your past matters, but it shouldn’t become your entire identity. Everyone deserves the opportunity to grow, change, and tell their own story. If I had more supplies, I would’ve added newspaper clippings, more photographs created by the youth, different textures, and maybe even broken chains or ripped paper to make the transition from negative labels to hope even stronger. I also would’ve layered more artwork together to make the collage feel even more connected. After reading both the article and Art of Protest, I realized that protest art isn’t just about criticizing something. It’s also about giving people a voice and encouraging others to see an issue differently. That’s what I wanted my collage to do. I hope when someone looks at it, they stop focusing on what society has called these young people and start seeing who they really are. Growing up, I learned that people can judge you before they know your story. That’s why this cause means so much to me, and that’s why I chose to end my collage with hope instead of judgment

.change

Carell Pigeot – Julio Anta

Before learning about Julio Anta or reading any of his work, I honestly thought graphic novels and comics were just for entertainment. When I hear graphic novel, my mind immediately goes to superheroes, action stories, or something I’d read for fun. I never really thought about them having meaningful messages or being used to talk about politics, immigration, identity, and belonging. What surprised me most about Julio Anta was the topics he chooses to write about. I found myself wondering, doesn’t he ever worry his books won’t sell? It would’ve been much easier to write stories that appeal to everyone or avoid certain topics altogether, but he didn’t. He’s built an entire career around telling stories that actually mean something to him, even after talking about some of the hurdles he’s faced along the way.

I also really admired his passion for getting these stories out into the world. He mentioned finding artists through Reddit to help bring some of his stories to life, and I actually laughed a little when he talked about it because it reminded me that sometimes we make success seem a lot more complicated than it has to be. Most people hear the word “no” a few times and either give up or change what they’re creating to make other people happy. Julio didn’t do that. He got creative and found another way because telling these stories meant something to him. His visit completely changed the way I look at graphic novels. Before, I would’ve told you they were solely for entertainment. Now I look at them as another form of storytelling that’s able to make difficult subjects more accessible, especially for younger audiences. I actually think it’s genius. Politics, immigration, culture, and identity aren’t always easy conversations to have, especially with younger people, but graphic novels make those conversations feel more approachable and engaging.

I also think they can make people feel a little less alone. There’s something powerful about reading a story and realizing someone else understands what you’re going through. Sometimes that’s all a person needs. The book that stood out to me most was Speak Up, Santiago! because I could personally relate to it. I’m Haitian, and I moved to the United States when I was young. Communication was really difficult for me because I didn’t speak English. What’s funny… and a little sad… is that I’ve now spent so much time speaking English that I’ve started losing some of my first language too. Family members in Haiti have been asking me to visit, and whenever I talk to them on the phone, I’m reminded of just how much Haitian Creole I’ve forgotten over the years. It’s almost ironic. I struggled not knowing English when I came here, and now I struggle sometimes finding the right words in the language I grew up speaking. Listening to Julio talk about his book “Speak Up, Santiago!” had me joking that I need to write “Speak Up, Carell!” one day. It reminded me that stories about belonging aren’t unique to one person. A lot of us are trying to figure out where home is and now to hold onto the parts of ourselves we don’t want to lose.

Because of that, stories about identity, language, and belonging really connect with me. I chose Julio Anta over Queer Van Kult because I’m really big on reaching younger generations. Long term, that’s something I want to do myself. I appreciate that he writes about serious topics but presents them in a creative way that younger audiences will actually want to engage with. Growing up in Harlem after moving from Haiti, I can relate to stories about finding where you belong and finding your voice. I think that’s another reason his visit resonated with me so much. If I could go back and ask him one question, I would ask if writing about political and social issues has ever affected his career or changed his writing process. Has there ever been something he wanted to include in one of his books but decided not to because of how it might be received? Or has his commitment to telling these stories always outweighed those concerns?

More than anything, Julio’s visit changed my perspective on graphic novels. I don’t look at them as just entertainment anymore. They’re another way to preserve experiences, tell meaningful stories, and start conversations that people might not otherwise have. Sometimes a graphic novel can say things that a traditional book can’t simply because you’re able to see and feel the story unfold at the same time. I didn’t expect to leave his visit thinking that, but I’m glad I did.

Carell Pigeot

I visited the Society of Illustrators on Saturday around 3 PM with a friend from BMCC. Since they close at 5 PM on Saturdays, I originally thought I would feel rushed trying to see everything before closing, but it ended up being the complete opposite. The space is much smaller than museum I’ve visited like The Met, but I actually appreciated that. Instead of feeling like I had to rush from one exhibit to the next, I found myself spending more time looking at individual pieces and thinking about what they were trying to say. Even though we only had a couple of hours before closing, it never felt rushed or crowded. In some ways, it reminded me of my visit to the Alice Austen House. Both spaces felt personal, but for different reasons. Alice Austen’s home told the story of one person’s life through her photographs and the spaces she lived in. The Society of Illustrators felt more like stepping into dozens of different conversations at once. Every artist had something different to say about society, culture, politics, and identity, which made the experience feel much more open to interpretation.

One thing I really liked was how much variety there was. Some pieces made me laugh, others made me stop and think. A few that stood out to me were Victor Juhasz’s “Making America Barckward Again”, the Gender Identity artwork, and Warren Miller’s “The Millionaire’s Club”. Even though they were all completely different, they each had something to say about society. I think that’s what I enjoyed most about this exhibit. It didn’t tell me what to think, it simply made me think. The piece that stayed with me the most was Warren Miller’s “The Millionaire’s Club.” At first, it almost looks funny. Everyone is pushing and squeezing their way into an exclusive club while a crowd outside watches from the window. But the longer I looked at it, the less funny it became. It started to feel like a reflection of the world we live in today. As someone majoring in Accounting and Finance and planning to work in finance, I think about money a lot. I don’t believe money is a bad thing. Money creates opportunities, provides security, and allows people to build things that can improve the lives of others. I want to be financially successful one day. There’s nothing wrong with that. But I also think we’ve reached a point where society almost worships money. It feels like people are constantly chasing more money, more status, and more success, even if it means stepping over someone else to get there.

Looking at this artwork made me wonder what people are actually fighting so hard for. Is it happiness? Is it freedom? Or is it simply the image of success that society tells us we’re supposed to chase? Sometimes I think people become so focused on getting to the next thing that they forget to enjoy the life they’re building along the way. One thing I’ve realized is that time is probably the most valuable thing we’ll ever have, yet it’s usually the first thing we’re willing to give away. We spend so much time chasing money that we forget why we wanted it in the first place. Money can give us opportunities and create security, but it can’t give us back the time we didn’t spend with the people we love or the experiences we never allowed ourselves to enjoy. People often forget the things that actually make life meaningful. Time with family. Friendships. Learning about different cultures. Traveling. Appreciating nature. Creating art. Even just slowing down enough to enjoy where you are. Those are things money can support, but they aren’t things money can replace. I think that’s why this artwork resonated with me so much. It reminded me that while I want to build a successful career and become financially successful one day, I never want money to become my identity. I want it to be a tool, not the purpose of my life.

greed

Carell Pigeot

I chose to recreate the photograph of someone sitting under the tree overlooking the water. Out of all the photos we recreated, this one stood out to me the most because it felt like a place of peace and reflection. Standing in the same location where Alice Austen had taken a photograph over a hundred years ago made me stop and think about what that space might have meant to her. Even though the world around it has changed, the feeling of the place hasn’t. It still feels quiet, calm, and like somewhere you can simply sit and think. One thing that really stood out to me during the visit was how difficult photography was in Alice Austen’s time. As someone who enjoys photography myself, I’m used to digital cameras where I can take hundreds of photos in seconds and instantly see the results. Alice Austen didn’t have that luxury. Every photograph took planning, patience, and effort. That made me appreciate her work even more because she wasn’t just taking pictures, she was preserving moments that we can still look at today. There’s a quote I’ve seen that says, “If you don’t photograph yourself, you die forever.” Whether or not that’s exactly true, I think photographs allow people and their stories to live on. The fact that we were able to recreate images she made in the 1890s in 2026 really showed me how powerful photography can be across generations.

To me, community means having a place where you belong no matter who you are or what you believe. Alice Austen’s photographs made me think about that in a different way. Many of her pictures showed her friends laughing, spending time together, and simply enjoying each other’s company. They weren’t just photographs, they documented the people she felt most connected to. The reading also explained how many of her more personal photographs reflected a close circle of friends and the life she built with Gertrude Tate, even during a time when society didn’t openly accept same sex relationships. The photograph that stayed with me was the one where Alice and her friends dressed as men. At first, it might just look like friends having fun, but knowing more about her life gave it a different meaning. It reminded me that she had to express parts of herself in a society that often wouldn’t have accepted her openly. Looking at those photographs today shows how much society has changed and why preserving these stories matters. Visiting the house with my classmates also made me think about community in the present. We explored the home together, listened to the tour guide, and used Polaroid cameras to recreate Alice Austen’s photographs. We were making new memories in the same places where she made hers over a century ago. That connection between the past and the present made the experience feel personal instead of just historical. I left feeling inspired and reflective. As a photographer, the visit reminded me that photographs are more than just images. They tell stories, preserve history, and connect people across generations. Standing where Alice Austen once stood and recreating one of her photographs made me realize that every photo has the potential to become part of someone’s history someday.

1 2 3

Carell Pigeot – My visit to the Metropolitan Museum of Art

This was my first time visiting the Museum of Art, I went alone and spent around three hours exploring different exhibits throughout the museum. Honestly, I cannot remember the last time I went to a museum, if I have ever been to one before. Because of that, I did not really know what to expect.

Before even walking inside, the building itself caught my attention. Museums like the Met have always intimidated me. The huge staircases, giant columns, and overall “old rich” look always made me feel like these places were built for a certain type of person. Growing up, I always pictured museums as places where wealthy people attended operas, fancy events, or things that simply did not involve people like me.

Reading “The Critical Museum Visitor” before visiting made me think differently about that feeling. Lindauer talks about museums creating experiences for visitors and even imagining an “ideal visitor”. Walking into the met, I started wondering who that ideal visitor was supposed to be and whether I fit that image. Looking back, I realize I had my own biases about museums. There was a lot of excitement walking in, but also some nervousness. Honestly, a big part of this trip was simply getting over my fear and stepping into a space that I had convinced myself was not meant for me.

I have always been passionate about photography and videography, so I know firsthand that presentation changes everything. The lighting, surroundings, framing, and even the amount of space given to something can completely change how people see it. Because of that, I paid just as much attention to the way things were displayed as I did to the artifacts themselves.

The Roman and Greek galleries had these enormous ceilings with natural light pouring in. Everything felt grand and important, almost like the museum wanted visitors to admire these artifacts as symbols of greatness. Other exhibits were much darker and quieter, which created a completely different feeling. it made me realize that museums are not just displaying objects. They are also shaping how visitors experience those objects.

The Knights and Armor exhibit was easily my favorite. Seeing the armor up close was incredible. Some of these suits covered almost the entire body, and even the horses wore armor. I could not stop thinking, how did anyone defeat an opponent wearing all of this? The cost of producing armor like that must been enormous. Clearly, not everyone had access to equipment like this. Was warfare mostly reserved for nobles and wealthy families? Those were the kinds of questions running through my mind as I walked through the exhibit.

The Islamic art gallery also caught my attention, especially a room dedicated almost entirely to rugs. One rug occupied an enormous amount of space, while only a few smaller objects surrounded it. My first thought was honestly, how can a rug alone hold this much value? The museum clearly wanted visitors to see it as something extremely important. The amount of space, lighting, and attention given to it completely changed the way I viewed it. Before this visit, I probably would have walked right past it.

Unfortunately, I was not able to see the entire museum because it was simply too large and I ran out of time. Honestly, that just gives me another reason to go back.

Knights